Coerced Agreement Definition

Coercion may involve the actual addition of physical pain/injury or psychological damage in order to increase the credibility of a threat. The threat of further harm may lead to the collaboration or obedience of the person who is being forced. The idea of “impure hands” is a defense that can be used for coercion in a contract. The general idea behind impure hands is that one party cannot be held responsible for coercion because the other party has committed the same act. Another way to understand this idea is that both sides forced each other to form the treaty. A common defense against contraction stress is “impure hands.” This is found when one party avoids liability because the other party is guilty of doing the same. Here, impure hands would mean that both sides have effectively forced the other to sign the agreement. In such situations, the contract would always be null and void because of the existence of the constraint. However, a dirty hand defense can help a party avoid certain commitments or remedies. “coercion” means the commission or threat of an act of ordinance (45 of 1860) or the unlawful detention or threat of possession of property to the detriment of a person, for the purpose of getting a person to enter into an agreement. Legally, it is often said that someone who has been coerced has acted under duress. In fact, “coercion” and “coercion” are often exchanged.

Black`s Law Dictionary defines coercion as “any unlawful threat or coercion. To make someone else act in a way they wouldn`t or wouldn`t do otherwise.” A, aboard an English ship on the high seas, pushes B to reach an agreement by an act equivalent to criminal intimidation under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).

Comments are closed.